Despite featuring many of the same weapon types, different games have varied ways of tackling how each of them works and feels. Sometimes this evolves through sequels, which is clearly evident when looking how how bows worked between The Last of Us and The Last of Us Part II. The decisions that lead to this change were numerous, according to a senior game designer at Naughty Dog, who has broken down exactly how it works.
In an enlightening thread on Twitter, designer Derek Mattson made the distinction between two popular methods of dealing with projectiles in games. One is used for slower moving ones, such a grenades, where a precise arc of movement can be displayed on screen to show players exactly how an object will move and where it will land, leaving just timing and placement up to the player. This is exactly how the bow in The Last of Us originally worked, with Mattson saying that the arrow could be seen as just a faster-moving grenade.
1. Treat the bow more like a grenade
The original TLOU does this. The 2D reticle is replaced with an in world GUI arc. The player has near perfect info on the path of the projectile. The projectile is no longer shot from the camera and the problem is circumvented all together. pic.twitter.com/kbZ4e3pMKf— Derek Mattson (@thedmatts) July 18, 2023
The downside to this approach, as Mattson continues, is a lower skill ceiling and a possible trade-off in satisfaction, since the ambiguity of where an arrow will land is completely removed. That’s where a second approach offers a solution, with Mattson using Tomb Raider as an example. He theorises that it uses a method that most firearms use in games, where the projectile doesn’t originate from the weapon but rather from the point on the player camera where the reticle is pointing. This works well for fast projectiles, such as bullets, but can lead to a disconnect with a bow and arrow as the animation of the string on the bow can misalign with the speed and trajectory of the arrow, diminishing the feel of the entire action.
